One of Toronto鈥檚 oldest schools is facing a heated legal battle over the firing of its principal, who claims he was unjustly dismissed in retaliation for speaking out against the president鈥檚 alleged sexist comments and attitudes inside an 鈥渙ld boys club鈥 culture.
John Voutsinos, 43, has launched two separate actions against De La Salle College and senior administrators; the most recent states he was terminated without cause as principal on Jan. 31, 2025, after raising concerns about Brother Domenic Viggiani鈥檚 鈥渦nacceptable, reprehensible and high-handed conduct,鈥 according to the statement of claim filed in Ontario Superior Court on April 29.
Viggiani is a member of the Institute of the Brothers of the Christian Schools, which runs the private, independent co-educational Catholic school, court documents say. Over a span of 50 years, he was a student at the college, teacher and principal, and has been president since 2010.
Founded in 海角社区官网in 1851, the prestigious school moved to its current, 12-acre location at 131 Farnham Ave., near Avenue Road, in 1931.
However, the school is pushing back against Voutsinos鈥檚 allegations. A statement of reply filed in response to a defamation lawsuit Voutsinos filed March 7 against Viggiani, school administrator Joseph Pupo, and Nicanor Catre, a lawyer and chair of the College鈥檚 board of directors, denies all allegations, and asserts Voutsinos was let go due to concerns over his handling of classroom scheduling and what it describes as his 鈥渃ampaign to oust鈥 Viggiani.

Former principal John Voutsinos, left, and school president Brother Domenic Viggiani, right.
delasalle.caThat document says Voutsinos 鈥渢urned on Brother Domenic鈥 and launched a campaign to oust him after he was removed from the building committee overseeing renovations to the college鈥檚 science and innovation centre, 鈥渂ecause of his constant interfering with plans and decisions.鈥 Voutsinos was also embarrassed when the school鈥檚 charitable foundation declined to accept a family鈥檚 donation that he had agreed to, despite not having the authority to do so, the statement of defence says.
His 鈥渜uest鈥 to oust Viggiani escalated when the board became aware of issues with the teaching schedule and the number of classroom hours taught. An audit committee prepared a report identifying 鈥渋ssues,鈥 and when Voutsinos鈥 response didn鈥檛 satisfy the board, members unanimously voted to fire him, the statement of defence says.
For his part, Voutsinos, in his reply, denies he was campaigning to oust Viggiano, that he was ever told he was interfering with building plans, nor did he solicit or accept any parents鈥 proposal regarding a donation to the college. Both of Voutsinos鈥 lawsuits were filed by lawyers Joe Groia and Leanne Gruppuso. They declined to comment.
Lawyers Gordon Meiklejohn and Gina Saccoccio Brannan, counsel to the De La Salle College, wrote in an email to the Star on Friday that the statement of defence to the first lawsuit 鈥渁ddresses the reasons for his termination.鈥
鈥淭he College is bound by employee/employer confidentiality, but it will file a statement of defence in due course to the second action and will vigorously defend Mr. Voutsinos鈥 allegations,鈥 the email stated.
鈥淭he College, its board, and staff remain singularly focused on promoting and fostering the best interests of its students and the College鈥檚 broader community and will continue to do so. Other than expressing profound regret that the former Principal has sought to advance his personal interests ahead of the interests of the College Community, no further comment will be made.鈥
None of the allegations in either side鈥檚 filings have been tested in court.聽
According to the court documents, Voutsinos was hired by the College in 2006 and continued working there for 19 years. Prior to becoming principal in August 2023, Voutsinos held a number of senior roles at the school, including teacher, guidance counsellor, director of student services and vice-principal. At the time of his dismissal, he earned about $195,000 a year along with benefits.
In his second lawsuit, a wrongful dismissal statement of claim filed this past week, Voutsinos alleges he made a number of serious complaints on behalf of himself and fellow staff members, both verbally and in writing, and that the school鈥檚 board of directors failed to initiate any investigation or make any further inquiry into the complaints.
On one occasion, the statement of claim alleges Viggiani warned Voutsinos not to hire young female teachers as there was a risk 鈥渢hey would become pregnant and cause disruption at the College.鈥
It also states female staff members did not feel supported at the College, and that Viggiani and other members of administration operated the College as 鈥渁n old boys club鈥 that privileged male staff.
For example, on one occasion, over Voutsinos鈥檚 objections, Viggiani organized a welcome dinner for new male teachers and declined to invite or organize a similar event for new female teachers, the statement of claim says.
鈥淢embers of staff also told Voutsinos that Viggiani had made racist and homophobic remarks about College staff. For example, members of staff told Voutsinos that Viggiani had said, 鈥渉ate the sin not the sinner鈥 to an LGBTQ+ staff member. They also complained that Viggiani鈥檚 emails to the College community often contained these offensive views.鈥
Staff members also complained to Voutsinos that proper business office procedures for budgeting and awarding contracts to third parties were not being followed by the College and that contracts were being awarded based on preferential treatment. Voutsinos was concerned that if left unaddressed, these instances of misconduct would cause a toxic workplace culture to develop at the College, the statement of claim says. That happened in 2024, notwithstanding his 鈥渂est efforts鈥 to prevent that from happening.
When Voutsinos shared these concerns in a private meeting with Catre, he alleges the lawyer told him 鈥渢here are whistleblower laws in Ontario that will protect you,鈥 the statement of claim says. Yet no steps were taken to address or investigate his complaints and Voutsinos continued to face harassment from Viggiani, the statement alleges. Instead, Voutsinos was 鈥渟ubjected to retaliation from Viggiani and other members of leadership at the College for raising the complaints,鈥 while Catre advised him to 鈥渆at a s—- sandwich鈥 for the next 18 months until Viggiani retired, the statement says.
Voutsinos is seeking a total of $3.5 million in damages.
To join the conversation set a first and last name in your user profile.
Sign in or register for free to join the Conversation