FILE - Easterseals Head Start program teaching assistant Tania Ortiz helps a student practice writing his name, Jan. 29, 2025, in Miami. (AP Photo/Rebecca Blackwell, File)
Judge blocks a Trump policy cutting off some social services for immigrants in the US illegally
A federal judge on Wednesday blocked Trump administration restrictions on services for immigrants in the country illegally, including the federal preschool program Head Start, health clinics and adult education.
FILE - Easterseals Head Start program teaching assistant Tania Ortiz helps a student practice writing his name, Jan. 29, 2025, in Miami. (AP Photo/Rebecca Blackwell, File)
A federal judge on Wednesday blocked Trump administration restrictions on services for immigrants in the country illegally, including the federal preschool program Head Start, health clinics and adult education.
The order from the judge in U.S. District Court in Rhode Island applies to 20 states and the District of Columbia, whose attorneys general, all Democrats, sued the administration. It puts the administration’s reinterpretation of a Clinton-era federal policy on hold while the case is decided.
Under the proposed changes, some community-level programs would be reclassified as , making them inaccessible to people without legal status. Individual public benefits, such as food stamps and college financial aid, have been largely unavailable to people in the country without legal status.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
U.S. District Judge Mary McElroy, who was appointed by Trump in 2019, said in her order that the policy rollout was 鈥渞ushed鈥 in a way that would worsen the impact for people cut off from community services and those tasked with verifying eligibility.
鈥淭he Government argues that it has somehow interpreted this statute incorrectly for the nearly thirty years that it has been the law,鈥 McElroy wrote. 鈥淚n its view, everyone ... has misunderstood it from the start 鈥 at least until last month, when the right way to read it became clear to the Government. The Court is skeptical of that.鈥
Messages seeking comment were left with the Department of Health and Human Services, the Education Department, the Department of Labor and the Department of Justice, which each were named as defendants.
The states鈥 lawsuit argued the government failed to follow the rulemaking process and did not provide the required notice on conditions placed on federal funds.
The rule changes had been paused initially within the states that sued after they reached a temporary agreement with the Trump administration.
鈥淲ith this victory, we are protecting children鈥檚 education, safeguarding critical health care, and preserving the safety net that keeps families afloat,鈥 New York Attorney General Letitia James said.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
Proponents of Head Start immediately voiced concern that the new policy would by taking away health services and educational opportunities. The administrative burdens of implementing the new rule would cause many under-resourced Head Start programs to close, according to the plaintiffs鈥 complaint.
The federal government said it interprets Head Start as a federal public benefit, similar to welfare programs that exclude immigrants in the country illegally. , whose agency oversees Head Start, said the directive would stop diverting 鈥渉ardworking Americans鈥 tax dollars to incentivize illegal immigration.鈥
In addition to preserving Head Start access, the lawsuit also sought to block the restrictions on other federal programs, including substance abuse services, mental health resources in schools, career and technical education, and job training opportunities.
