Doug Ford鈥檚 Progressive Conservatives 鈥渇avoured certain developers鈥 in a controversial $8.28-billion Greenbelt land swap rammed through in a fashion the premier admits was 鈥渨rong,鈥 the auditor general found.
In a searing 93-page report to the legislature Wednesday, Bonnie Lysyk concluded Ford鈥檚 opening up of 7,400 acres of environmentally protected land last fall 鈥渃annot be described as a standard or defensible process.鈥
That process was run by Ryan Amato, the chief of staff to Municipal Affairs and Housing Minister Steve Clark, without proper input from independent bureaucrats or land-use experts, she said.
But the premier and Clark, who took media questions for more than an hour, vowed to continue with the land swap 鈥 which will benefit Tory-connected landowners 鈥 despite the auditor general鈥檚 push for them to reconsider.
鈥淭he buck stops with me and I take full responsibility for the need for better process,鈥 said Ford, adding no heads would roll for the debacle and that 鈥渁bsolutely鈥 no one in his government personally benefited from the decision.
NDP Leader Marit Stiles, who decried the 鈥渃orruption,鈥 and interim Liberal leader John Fraser, who warned of 鈥渢he stench of insider trading,鈥 called on the premier to sack the embattled minister.
An unrepentant Clark said the Greenbelt had to be opened up in order for the province to meet its promised target of building 1.5-million homes over the next decade to alleviate Ontario鈥檚 housing crisis.
Lysyk disputed that, saying the Tories did not need the 15 parcels of land to achieve their goal.
Alongside housing minister Steve Clark, Ontario Premier Doug Ford held a press conference in 海角社区官网on Wednesday regarding the province鈥檚 housing crisis 鈥 going on to acknowledge the controversy surrounding his government鈥檚 recent and 鈥渂iased鈥 Greenbelt land swaps and development plans. (Global News)
While the auditor general met with the Ontario Provincial Police, she stopped short of calling for a criminal probe, noting 鈥渨hatever happens in the future will be up to the OPP to decide.鈥
In response, the police said 鈥渁t this time, there is no change in status in terms of the ongoing review of the matter by the OPP Anti-Rackets Branch.鈥
Lysyk wrote in her report that she 鈥渇ound that how the land sites were selected was not transparent, fair, objective or fully informed.鈥
The financial watchdog zeroed in on the role of Amato, who was vacationing in Italy on Wednesday and couldn鈥檛 be reached for comment, in selecting the plots of Greenbelt land opened up for development.
鈥淒irect access to the housing minister鈥檚 chief of staff resulted in certain prominent developers receiving preferential treatment,鈥 she wrote, pointing to a dinner Amato attended with landowners last Sept. 14.
That鈥檚 a reference to the Building Industry and Land Development Association鈥檚 (BILD) Chair鈥檚 Dinner, a $250-a-plate event at the Paramount Eventspace in Woodbridge.
鈥淎ltogether, those who had access to the chief of staff at the September BILD event ended up with land removals that accounted for 6,784 acres, or 92 per cent of the 7,412.64 acres ultimately removed from the Greenbelt in December 2022,鈥 Lysyk wrote.
Regarding the BILD gala, Amato told Lysyk that 鈥渢wo prominent housing developers approached him and gave him packages containing information to remove two land sites from the Greenbelt.鈥
The two land sites are associated with Tory-connected developers Silvio De Gasperis and Michael Rice.
They were the Duffins Rouge agricultural preserve site in Durham Region and the Bathurst-King site in York Region.
鈥淭he chief of staff sat at the same dinner table with one of these two developers,鈥 the auditor added.
But Amato assured Lysyk that 鈥渨henever he received any packages, he did not immediately open them and review their contents.鈥
鈥淗e said that, instead, he kept them in a stack in his office, adding new packages to the stack as he received them from developers and their representatives,鈥 she said.
鈥淗e also noted that he did not tell the developers and landowners that the government was considering removing land from the Greenbelt, but would consider the requests if it decided to do so.鈥
Last Oct. 6, Amato 鈥減rovided hard copy information from packages he received on eight sites to the Greenbelt project team鈥 studying proposed boundary changes.
by on Scribd
鈥淭he Greenbelt exercise calls into question who, if anyone, was supervising a non-elected chief of staff. In our view, the housing minister ought to have known,鈥 Lysyk told reporters.
Rice and De Gasperis went to court to block or delay Lysyk鈥檚 order to be interviewed under oath and hand over pertinent documents.
Each argued they were private citizens and that the provincial auditor was overstepping her authority 鈥 a view shared by the premier.
While Rice did not comment on the report, a lawyer for the De Gasperis family鈥檚 TACC Group said the lands owned by the company were purchased before the creation of the Greenbelt in 2005 and the company has lobbied for their removal for many years.
鈥淭here is no way of knowing the value of the land at this point in time, as there are significant costs to develop the land, which will be paid by the developers, including roads, parks, lands for health care, fire and safety, education, urban agriculture, as well as other community benefits and additional infrastructure,鈥 said lawyer Neil Wilson.
鈥淕overnments do not build communities and housing. Developers and homebuilders do, and they do it on private land. 鈥 The TACC Group is one of the few developers with the breadth of experience, knowledge, and resources, as well as the land, to build complete and environmentally responsible communities to meet Ontario鈥檚 housing needs.鈥
Lysyk also detailed a furious lobbying effort by landowners as they scrambled to get their land included in the weeks leading up to Ford and Clark鈥檚 surprise policy U-turn.
鈥淲e found that 12 of the 15 parcels of land chosen for removal from the Greenbelt had been, as noted by the housing minister鈥檚 chief of staff, requested for removal by developers or their representatives,鈥 she wrote.
鈥淢any of these individuals had advocated for the removal in emails and in-person meetings within a few months prior to their removal.鈥
Since then-premier Dalton McGuinty鈥檚 Liberal government created the Greenbelt in 2005, various landowners have requested about 500 properties be removed, but 鈥渙nly 22 land sites were considered in the 2022 selection exercise.鈥
鈥淥f those, only one was proposed by the housing ministry鈥檚 non-political public service staff, while 21 were provided directly by the housing minister鈥檚 chief of staff,鈥 wrote Lysyk.
鈥淥f the 15 land sites ultimately approved for removal 鈥 14 were brought into the exercise by the housing minister鈥檚 chief of staff and one was identified by the housing ministry鈥檚 non-political public service staff.鈥
The premier said no speculators were tipped off to the November boundary amendments, which affect the 15 parcels of land in King, Vaughan, Richmond Hill, Pickering, Markham, Whitchurch-Stouffville, Clarington and Hamilton.
But the Star and the Narwhal have reported eight of those 15 affected plots were purchased after Ford鈥檚 Tories took power in 2018.
Lysyk鈥檚 probe comes in parallel to an ongoing investigation into the Greenbelt deals by Integrity Commissioner J. David Wake, the province鈥檚 ethics watchdog.
The auditor general recommended that Wake determine whether Amato acted contrary to the Public Service of Ontario Act 鈥渨ith respect to his liaisons with land developers.鈥
Her report also called on the government to 鈥渞e-evaluate鈥 the decision to change the Greenbelt boundaries because Ford and Clark maintain they had no idea the process for choosing the lands was questionable.
鈥淭he premier and the minister of housing have communicated to us that they were unaware that the pre-selection of lands for removal from the Greenbelt was biased, controlled and directed by the housing minister鈥檚 chief of staff (a political public servant) rather than informed by environmental, agricultural and infrastructure considerations,鈥 she wrote.
That sounded 鈥渟omewhat implausible or dubious鈥 to the NDP鈥檚 Stiles.
The Liberals鈥 Fraser agreed, saying 鈥渋t鈥檚 not plausible鈥 that Ford and Clark were in the dark.
Lysyk also highlighted the environmental impact of Ford鈥檚 moves, noting the Ministry of Agriculture said about 76 per cent of the 7,400 acres affected was active farmland last year.
That鈥檚 significant because only about five per cent of the entire province can be used for farming.
鈥淎bout 83 per cent of the area removed is classified as Class 1-3 prime agricultural lands, which is of the highest quality and capability for agriculture,鈥 she noted, adding 鈥渁lmost 1,000 acres of wetlands and woodlands鈥 were exposed by the changes.
鈥淲ithout the protection provided by the Greenbelt Plan, these natural features are at increased risk of being paved over, drained or polluted 鈥 (which) can increase flooding, impair water quality, contribute to climate change and reduce biodiversity.鈥
According to the federal Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, there are 29 species at risk living or likely to live in that parcel.
As well, development of Pickering鈥檚 Duffins Rouge agricultural preserve 鈥渋s expected to increase flood risk within the area and for downstream lands already prone to flooding.鈥
That means existing and proposed homes closer to Lake Ontario could also be affected.
鈥淧rovincial government actions 鈥 failed to consider environmental, agricultural and financial risks and impacts, proceeded with little input from experts or affected parties, and favoured certain developers/landowners,鈥 said Lysyk.
Her auditors asked the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation (MPAC), which calculates property values in Ontario, for an estimate on the change in value of the land eliminated from the Greenbelt.
鈥淢PAC estimated that removing the 15 land sites from the Greenbelt has the potential to increase their value by $8.28 billion,鈥 she wrote.
De Gasperis鈥檚 Duffins Rouge site alone 鈥減otentially鈥 increased in value by $6.63 billion.
Ford has pointed out that as part of allowing development of 7,400 acres of the two-million-acre Greenbelt, he added 9,400 acres elsewhere to the massive swath of environmentally sensitive lands.
However, Lysyk found 7,000 of those 9,400 acres were 鈥渁lready protected under other means.鈥
With files from Brendan Kennedy and Noor Javed
Rob Ferguson is a Toronto-based reporter covering Ontario politics for the Star. Follow him on Twitter:
Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request.
There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again.
You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our and . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google and apply.
Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page.
To join the conversation set a first and last name in your user profile.
Sign in or register for free to join the Conversation