OTTAWA 鈥 President-elect Donald Trump鈥檚 victory Tuesday paves the way for an agenda which could cost Canada billions, including demands for higher defence spending and steep new tariffs on every shipment into the U.S.
Trump will return to the White House in January after beating Vice-President Kamala Harris in a closely fought election. He is promising tariffs of at least 10 per cent, potentially as much as 20 per cent, on all goods entering America. He has also demanded that NATO countries, like Canada, boost defence spending.
Flavio Volpe, president of the Automotive Parts Manufacturers’ Association, said Canada has to take the threat seriously.
鈥淲e learned in 2016 to 2020 to take his tariff threats at face value. If he says he is going to do it, he is going to do it,鈥 Volpe said.
Canada does approximately $3.5 billion in trade with the U.S. every day, which could mean millions in tariffs charged to Canadian companies.
Canadian Press reporter Kelly Geraldine Malone discusses election night in the United States and the possible ramifications for Canada's relationship with its closest ally. (Nov. 6, 2024 / The Canadian Press)
Volpe said the U.S. has concerns about Canada鈥檚 digital services tax and about access Chinese companies have to the Canadian market, but overall, it is a good trade relationship. He said he expects most tariffs on Canada would be short-lived because they would only hurt American consumers.
Canadian Chamber of Commerce president Candace Laing implored the Liberal government to do everything it can to ensure the tariffs don鈥檛 come to pass.
鈥淐anada鈥檚 government must collaborate effectively with the Trump administration to preserve and strengthen our bilateral economic partnership,鈥 Laing said in a written statement.
鈥淏y resisting tariffs and trade barriers that will only raise prices and hurt consumers in both countries, Canada and the United States can strengthen resilient cross-border supply chains that enhance our shared economic security.鈥
The chamber commissioned University of Calgary economist Trevor Tombe to study Trump鈥檚 proposed tariffs. He found they could result in up to a five per cent drop in Canada鈥檚 GDP and reduce Canadians’ income by $1,100 a year on average, while also hurting Americans in the process.
On Parliament Hill Wednesday, government ministers seemed to downplay the threat. Trade Minister Mary Ng congratulated Trump and said she was eager to work with the new administration.
鈥淲e look forward to working with them, to make sure that this really important trade relationship between Canada and the United States continues to be strong,鈥 Ng said.
Industry Minister Fran莽ois-Philippe Champagne said the government is prepared to deal with the new administration, and learned from trade negotiations that took place when Trump was previously in power.
鈥淭he good thing for Canadians is, we’re ready. I was already texting folks in the United States and they’re responding,鈥 he said. 鈥淢any of us served during the former Trump administration, but I think now we move from just being the friendly neighbour of the North to a strategic partner.鈥
Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland noted that the current trade deal between Canada and the U.S. is one Trump negotiated. She said beyond relationships and past associations, Canada offers the U.S. a better deal on trade than most other countries.
鈥淎t the end of the day, the reason that we were successful in getting a win-win outcome in the NAFTA negotiations was because the Canada-U.S. economic relationship is beneficial to both parties,鈥 Freeland said. 鈥淲e build things together and Canadian workers do not undercut U.S. workers. We have similar labour and environmental standards and we are both high-wage countries.鈥
At Queen鈥檚 Park, Premier Doug Ford said he conferred with Freeland on Tuesday night about the spectre of Trump鈥檚 tariffs.
鈥淚 had a conversation last night with Minister Freeland and we’re united. We’re united with the federal government and we’re going to be united with all the premiers and we’ll get this done, but I’m very confident things will work out,鈥 Ford told reporters Wednesday.
The premier noted that when Trump slapped tariffs on some Canadian products in 2019, Canada retaliated.
鈥淲e did it last time. They put tariffs on our steel. Didn’t last too long, because 鈥 when I talked to Chrystia (at the time and I) went down there, talked to (Trump鈥檚 then trade representative Robert) Lighthizer and I went back and said, 鈥楾ariff everything.鈥 That doesn’t work. It doesn’t work for either country 鈥 I think they realized that. They pulled the tariffs off extremely quickly after we did this,鈥 said Ford.
Asked if he was concerned about the impact of a second Trump presidency on Canada鈥檚 electric vehicle strategy, the premier said 鈥淚 believe the market will dictate鈥 demand for such cars and trucks and their batteries.
Trump鈥檚 policies could save the government money in one respect. He has speculated about cancelling subsidies for electric vehicle production. The Biden administration brought in massive subsidies for EV production.
Canada and Ontario matched those production subsidies to lure Volkswagen to St. Thomas, Ont., which could cost $13 billion. It offered the same deal to Stellantis for its Windsor, Ont. plant at a cost of potentially $15 billion.
Both of those deals included provisions that Canada would not pay out the subsidies if the U.S. cancelled its subsidies.
Economic Development Minister Vic Fedeli said the world鈥檚 automakers will be 鈥渨atching closely鈥 but Ontario could benefit, citing the province鈥檚 deal last April to land $15 billion in investment from Honda for four new factories without that specific type of incentive.
鈥淭hat was a pretty clear signal that we鈥檙e just the right place to be for some of these manufacturers,鈥 added Fedeli.
Fedeli said provincial officials will be heading to Washington again in the coming months to continue their 鈥渃harm offensive鈥 by reminding U.S. policymakers that nine million Americans make products shipped to Ontario.
In addition to potentially denting Canada鈥檚 economy with tariffs, Trump is also likely to lean on Canada to spend more on defence. He has argued all NATO countries need to meet the alliance’s target of two per cent of GDP on military spending.
Without specific details, the government has said it will reach that target by 2032. Its forecast spending to 2030 would get Canada to 1.7 per cent of GDP.
But the Parliamentary Budget Officer has recently found those numbers are misleading, because the government was predicting a very low growth scenario for Canada.
The PBO found Canada would only be at 1.58 per cent by 2030 and would need to be spending nearly $82 billion by 2032, twice what Canada spends now, to meet the NATO target.
Defence Minister Bill Blair insisted Canada will meet the NATO target.
鈥淲e鈥檙e investing significantly in our defence capabilities. We鈥檝e made a commitment to ... all of our NATO allies, including the United States, that we have a plan to get there, and we鈥檙e going to work really hard.鈥
Correction - Nov. 7, 2024
This article was edited from a previous version that misstated the location of the Volkswagen EV battery manufacturing plant.听 It is being built in St.Thomas, Ont., not London, Ont.听听
Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request.
There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again.
You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our and . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google and apply.
Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page.
To join the conversation set a first and last name in your user profile.
Sign in or register for free to join the Conversation