海角社区官网

The Kansas group filed its lawsuit Friday in U.S. District Court in Kansas.

鈥淜ansas has adopted a series of impermissibly restrictive, overbroad and vague restrictions on issue-advocacy speech that will unconstitutionally impede public debates about some of the most important policy issues of our time,鈥� the lawsuit said.

The law will take effect less than a year after to block foreign money in its elections. Kansas lawmakers heard committee testimony earlier this year from Ohio’s Republican secretary of state, Frank LaRose, along with conservative groups, and they as an example of why Kansas should enact its own law.

Two groups and three individuals filed to suit to challenge Ohio’s law almost immediately, but in October, a federal appeals court allowed Ohio to enforce it ahead of a trial of that lawsuit.

Federal law bars foreign nationals from contributing to campaigns or political committees. But the new Kansas law will bar groups campaigning for or against proposed amendments to the state constitution from accepting contributions 鈥渄irectly or indirectly鈥� from foreign nationals. The groups also will have to certify that no named donors received more than $100,000 from a foreign national during the previous four years, and groups violating the law can be barred from electioneering for four years.

Kansans for Constitutional Freedom said it wants to raise money for a campaign in 2026 against a proposal from Republicans to amend the state constitution to end the governor’s appointment of state Supreme Court justices and The group sees the measure as attacking the courts’ independence.

The group raised almost $11 million for its effort to defeat the anti-abortion ballot question in 2022, and nearly $1.5 million came from the Sixteen Thirty Fund, campaign finance reports show.

The new Kansas law passed the Republican-controlled Legislature with more than the two-thirds majority required to override a veto. Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly said the measure 鈥済oes too far,鈥� but let it become law without her signature.

Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach, a Republican named as a defendant in the lawsuit along with state ethics commission members, noted the law’s bipartisan support.

鈥淩epublicans and Democrats agree that foreign corporations and foreign citizens must not be allowed to influence the outcome when Kansas constitutional amendments are placed before voters,鈥� Kobach said in a statement Monday. 鈥淚t is a core principle of self-government.鈥�

In allowing Ohio to enforce its law, the Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said concerns about foreign influence in elections 鈥渄ate back to the Founding,鈥� citing first President George Washington’s Farewell Address.

鈥淎nd Ohioans and their representatives have a compelling interest in regulating such influence,鈥� the appeals court majority said.

But the Kansas law’s restrictions fall on advocacy groups in prohibiting them from accepting federal funds. Also, groups must avoid donations even from U.S. citizens if they’ve received enough foreign funds 鈥� restricting their free speech rights under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution as well, the lawsuit argues.

鈥淭here is no reason why a donor should have to provide detailed and confidential information about its own funding sources,鈥� the lawsuit said.