海角社区官网police were 鈥渦sed鈥 to go after a Chinese Canadian couple embroiled in a landlord and tenant dispute over alleged anti-Asian racism in a Rosedale apartment building, according to a complaint filed with the Office of the Independent Police Review Director (OIPRD).
In their complaint, tenants Dot and Paul Pang also say an officer involved in the case made Facebook posts last year that they describe as 鈥渙ffensive with overt tones of racial animus.鈥 The Pangs allege Const. Timothy Somers鈥 personal social media posts reveal an underlying racial bias that may have affected his judgment 鈥渨hen it came to us, a Chinese-speaking couple.鈥
The Pangs claim Somers and other officers working out of 海角社区官网police 53 Division were 鈥渆nabling and supporting鈥 the landlord and a group of other tenants in a long-running dispute dating back to 2011 鈥 one year after they moved into One Rosedale.
The landlord and tenants, the Pangs allege, used police as 鈥渋ntimidation鈥 and made allegations about their mental health in a 鈥渨eaponizing鈥 way to influence how police dealt with them, 鈥渢he only non-whites in a building in the predominantly white, wealthy enclave of Rosedale.鈥
The couple has made a separate application to the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, alleging racist behaviour by tenants and the landlord of One Rosedale Road. That application went to mediation this week.
None of the allegations in either the OIPRD complaint and the human rights application have been proven, and the respondents in the rights complaint deny them.
鈥淢r. and Mrs. Pang refused to have any constructive dialogue with their neighbours and instead made numerous allegations, which are strongly denied,鈥 the tenants named in the human rights application said in an emailed statement to the Star, via their lawyer Adnan Subzwari.
They pointed to a third-party investigation done years ago on behalf of the landlord that 鈥渇ound no evidence of racial discrimination鈥 at the building.
Some tenants have also alleged the Pangs are homophobic, which the couple denies. One tenant named as a respondent in the Pangs鈥 human rights application last year launched a defamation suit against the couple after the Pangs crafted and circulated letters to the landlord about 鈥淚nstitutional Racism and White Privilege in Rosedale.鈥
Police, including Somers, were involved in multiple calls for service over the years, including a 2020 complaint about those same letters, according to documents obtained by the Pangs.
海角社区官网police sent two officers on two consecutive days to One Rosedale over the complaint about the letters, the Pangs state in their OIPRD filings, questioning why police would be investigating, yet again, a non-criminal matter.
Documents the Pangs obtained through freedom of information requests show them being portrayed as instigators in the dispute, when they say they were the victims. In a 2016 email obtained by the couple, Somers writes that 鈥渢he bottom line is, the bulk of the information we have is that the Pangs are the instigators of many of the issues, this is simply because of the number of complaints against them.鈥
The Pangs say that in their experience with Somers and 53 Division, 鈥渋t is no surprise that racialized communities are apprehensive about reaching out to TPS.鈥
In their application to the Human Rights Tribunal, the Pangs alleged two periods of discrimination against them at the building. An adjudicator dismissed all occurrences for one of the periods, but ruled the other would proceed.
Since the rights case is before the tribunal, Aubrey Hannah 鈥 general manager of One Rosedale Road Inc., the landlord 鈥 said he did not 鈥渨ish to comment on this matter.鈥
Police are also not commenting, since a formal complaint has now been made.
Dot and Paul Pang, seen here in a May 30, 2017, file photo.
Jim Rankin / 海角社区官网StarPart of the story of One Rosedale has already landed before the Landlord and Tenant Board 鈥 and in the 海角社区官网Star. In 2017, One Rosedale Rd. Inc. launched a failed effort to evict the Pangs for 鈥渟ubstantially鈥 interfering with other tenants鈥 enjoyment of the place.
A 2017 Star story explored the history of interactions the Pangs had with tenants, including an alleged break-in to their apartment that went unsolved and incidents of alleged anti-Asian racism. In one instance, the words 鈥淐RAZY CHINESE鈥 were written on a defaced poster.
A third-party investigator hired by the landlord called the Pangs 鈥渙utsiders to the social fabric of 1 Rosedale,鈥 and found the couple genuinely felt they were being discriminated against but that discrimination by any individuals could not be proven.
Police are not named as respondents in the couple鈥檚 human rights complaint. But the case details their involvement in mostly non-criminal matters in the building where the couple 鈥 Dot is a former journalist, and Paul works in banking 鈥 still live. In 2017, police told the Star police involvements were about 鈥渧arious tenant issues鈥 and that there had been police attempts at 鈥渕ediation and other means鈥 to resolve them.
The Pangs said they decided to file their complaint to the OIPRD after coming across posts Somers, the key officer involved in the One Rosedale dispute, made on his publicly accessible Facebook page last year following the death of George Floyd.
According to frame grabs made by the Pangs and shared with the Star, Somers wrote that Black Lives Matter is a 鈥渉ate group that must be eliminated by the government鈥 and that 鈥減olice are not a threat to black lives, black people are a threat to each other!鈥
In another post, he shared content that has since been deleted, with a headline above it calling for a 鈥淲HITE STRIKE 鈥 POLICE HAVE HAD ENOUGH!鈥 In another, he wrote that the 鈥減erception of racism is a myth,鈥 and in yet another, he attacks the CBC, CTV, Global and other media for 鈥渞einforcing a racially motivated narrative that is not representative of the vast majority of people!鈥
In their complaint, the Pangs wrote that Somers鈥檚 comments are 鈥渋nappropriate鈥 for a police officer 鈥渨ith immense responsibilities鈥 to himself, fellow officers and the public.
鈥淎fter viewing his posts this summer,鈥 the Pangs wrote, 鈥渨e have serious concerns with how police 鈥 have dealt with cases involving us,鈥 adding that the posts reveal an underlying racial bias, that may have 鈥渁ffected (Somers鈥) judgment when it came to us, a Chinese-speaking couple.鈥
The Pangs are asking the OIPRD to delve into Somers鈥 involvement in all incidents involving them.
Somers did not respond to emails and a phone message from the Star seeking comment. Police corporate communications confirmed Somers is aware of the complaint. It is rare for police officers to comment on matters that are the subject of a complaint.
Somers鈥 Facebook posts were deleted after the Star contacted him and also sought comment from the police service.
The service does have a procedure around social media use, police spokesperson Connie Osborne said in an email. The policy includes personal use, and that any 鈥渃ontent of those postings not jeopardize the integrity and reputation of the service, or the reputation or safety of other persons.鈥
The Pangs contacted the police hate crimes unit about the incidents at the building. It had some involvement but the case wound up back in the hands of 53 Division, which typically makes the call on whether it needs assistance from the unit.
Noting a spike in anti-Asian racism following the pandemic, the Pangs wrote in their complaint that 鈥渉arassment鈥 against them continues into 2021 鈥 including false mental health reports to police about them.
鈥淭his is a case of systemic and institutional racism,鈥 the couple writes in the complaint.
To join the conversation set a first and last name in your user profile.
Sign in or register for free to join the Conversation